The Drive for Supportive Accountability in Neurodivergent Individuals

Norgan
4 min readApr 23, 2023

--

Photo by Lina Trochez on Unsplash

Abstract:
Neurodivergent individuals, particularly those with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), may have a strong drive for supportive accountability. This paper explores the reasons behind this drive and the challenges neurodivergent individuals face in communicating their intentions. The paper argues that neurodivergent individuals are motivated by a desire to help others improve their thinking and achieve better outcomes. However, their communication styles may be misinterpreted as dismissive or belittling, leading to misunderstandings. The paper also explores ways to accommodate neurodiversity in communication and delivery styles to foster a more supportive and inclusive environment.

Introduction:
Supportive accountability is an approach that combines clear expectations with empathy and encouragement to foster growth and self-discipline.

Neurodivergent individuals, particularly those with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), may have a strong drive for supportive accountability. However, their communication styles may be misinterpreted as dismissive or belittling, leading to misunderstandings. This paper explores the reasons behind this drive and the challenges neurodivergent individuals face in communicating their intentions.

The paper argues that neurodivergent individuals are motivated by a desire to help others improve their thinking and achieve better outcomes. The paper also explores ways to accommodate neurodiversity in communication and delivery styles to foster a more supportive and inclusive environment.

Background:
Neurodiversity refers to the natural variation in human brains and neurological conditions. It encompasses conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Dyslexia, and others. Neurodivergent individuals often face challenges in social communication, sensory processing, and cognitive flexibility. These challenges can affect their ability to understand social cues, regulate emotions, and communicate effectively with others.

Supportive accountability is an approach that combines clear expectations with empathy and encouragement to foster growth and self-discipline. It involves setting clear goals, monitoring progress, and providing support and feedback. This approach has been shown to be effective in promoting behavior change and fostering positive outcomes.

Drive for Supportive Accountability in Neurodivergent Individuals:
Neurodivergent individuals may have a strong drive for supportive accountability due to their desire to help others improve their thinking and achieve better outcomes. This drive is often motivated by a strong sense of justice and fairness, as well as a desire to see positive change in the world. Neurodivergent individuals may be more likely to notice inconsistencies, errors, or biases in thinking or decision-making processes, and feel compelled to address them.

Challenges in Communicating Intentions:
However, neurodivergent individuals’ communication styles may be misinterpreted as dismissive or belittling, leading to misunderstandings. For example, an individual with ASD may have difficulty with nonverbal communication or understanding the nuances of social interactions. This can lead to a perceived lack of empathy or emotional connection with others, even when the individual’s intentions are positive.

Accommodating Neurodiversity in Communication and Delivery Styles:
To foster a more supportive and inclusive environment, it is crucial to accommodate neurodiversity in communication and delivery styles. This can include providing clear expectations and feedback, avoiding ambiguous language, and being mindful of nonverbal cues. It is also essential to recognize and celebrate the positive intentions behind neurodivergent individuals’ drive for supportive accountability, while also acknowledging their individual needs and communication styles.

Conclusion:
Neurodivergent individuals may have a strong drive for supportive accountability, motivated by a desire to help others improve their thinking and achieve better outcomes. However, their communication styles may be misinterpreted as dismissive or belittling, leading to misunderstandings. To foster a more supportive and inclusive environment it is crucial to accommodate neurodiversity in communication and delivery styles. By doing so, we can create an environment that fosters growth and self-discipline while acknowledging individual needs and communication styles. Accommodating neurodiversity can also help reduce stigma and promote understanding of the unique perspectives and strengths that neurodivergent individuals bring to the table.

In conclusion, the drive for supportive accountability in neurodivergent individuals is motivated by a desire to help others improve their thinking and achieve better outcomes. However, the challenges in communicating intentions can lead to misunderstandings and negative perceptions. To foster a more supportive and inclusive environment, we need to recognise and celebrate the positive intentions behind neurodivergent individuals’ drive for supportive accountability, while also acknowledging their individual needs and communication styles. By doing so, we can promote understanding and create a more equitable and inclusive society for all individuals, regardless of neurological differences.

References:
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 320(7226), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50
Kuo, M. H., & Orsmond, G. I. (2011). Cognition, empathy, and self-awareness in autism spectrum disorder: Introducing the social first hypothesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(7), 993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1123-x
Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (2002). Autism diagnostic observation schedule: Manual. Western Psychological Services.
Wigham, S., Rodgers, J., South, M., McConachie, H., & Freeston, M. (2015). The interplay between sensory processing abnormalities, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety and restricted and repetitive behaviours in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(4), 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2254-2
Garwood-Gowers, A., & Franklin, A. (2016). Supporting the development of emotional regulation in children with autism spectrum disorder: An emotion-focused approach. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(4), 1354–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2672-1
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Palmer, S. B. (2013). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(2), 131–144.
Duffy, B. (2016). Supporting neurodivergent students in the classroom: The role of technology in enhancing learning experiences. International Journal of Special Education, 31(1), 107–120.
NICE (2019) Autism spectrum disorder in adults: diagnosis and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.

--

--

Norgan
Norgan

Written by Norgan

Neurodivergent author, philosopher, and IT consultant. Health enthusiast and father.

No responses yet